Loneliness in Of Mice and Men

Loneliness in Of Mice and MenLoneliness is an inevitable part of life, which many individuals struggle with. It is an emotional response to a lack of companionship and communication with others, which has a huge impact in ones overall behavior. Some impacted individuals may try to end their solitariness others live hopeless and bitter. The theme of loneliness is presented in John Steinbecks Of Mice and Men. The novel Of Mice and Men portrays loneliness as a complex emotion that often drives individuals to behavioral extremes. Steinbeck uses characters, rough of the most important ones including Curleys married woman, sweeten and Crooks, to reflect on the discriminative time period that ultimately lead to the characters loneliness and particular behaviors.Curleys wife is a study female character in Of Mice and Men and is married to Curley, a very aggressive ranch worker that proves his masculinity by fighting other workers and marrying a physically attractive woman moreover, he w as the boss son. Curley had a huge control over his wife which was very common during the grand Depression, and the other workers. He had forbidden all of the workers from talking to his wife. Desperate for friends, attention and respect, Curleys wife uses her beauty and status with Curley to her advantage. In chapter 4, she intimidated the workers in Crooks room as of means for get attention and threatened Crooks when he told her to leave his room, saying that he could get sprung up on a tree so easy, it aint even funny (Steinbeck 81). Her refreshing behavior resulted in further discrimination and harassment. She was labelled as a tramp (Steinbeck 32), and other derogatory names. She felt powerless and lonely. The only person that Curleys wife could talk to was Lennie, because he was not conscious of her current situation. In her last moments with Lennie in the barn scene, she finally felt like she was being acknowledged and listened to. For the graduation time, she confessed t hat I don like Curley. He aint a nice fella (Steinbeck 89). She became vulnerable to her military manity and this ironically lead to her death. Curleys wife is a brilliant poser of the oppression against women in the 1930s, sexism, and near of the behavioral changes that came along with being stripped of ones identity in society.There are other reasons why people were discriminated and isolated, close to of which includes ageism and ableism. Candy was the oldest ranch worker in the book, that lost his right arm in an accident. He was discriminated because of his age and disability, and was an outcast. He had no family, except for the frump he raised. His dog used to be of great usefulness, but as the dog became older, he became less useful and helpless. This resulted in him being shot by Carlson which intensified Candys loneliness. Candys dog is a prime example of the social issue of ageism and ableism in society at that time. Workers were expected to be fatty on the ranch, an d if one no longer met that demand, due to age or ability to perform certain tasks, they would be dismissed and left to suffer (Steinbeck 1937). Candy recognizes that the same thing will happen to him, and he tells George that Jus as soon as I cant swamp out no bunkhouses theyll put me on the county (Steinbeck 60). To escape his loneliness and eventual fate of getting kicked, Candy becames quickly invested in George and Lennies dream, offering a total of $350 towards the dream farm. Spose I went in with you guys. Thas trio hundred an fifty bucks Id put in. I aint much good, but I could cook and tend the chickens and hoe the garden some. Howd that be? (Steinbeck 59). He was very devoted and hooked onto the dream of the farm, and persisted to have the farm in spite of what happened with Lennie later in the novel. The farm would have eliminated his fear of being alone, and develop another family worth cherishing. His current position in society forced him to develop a specific minds et to escape his destination.One of the biggest issues that was prevalent in the expectant Depression was racism, which Crooks was a victim of. He was physically separated from the other men, and had limited contact with others. As a replacement for friendship, he kept himself occupy with books. Still, he admitted that Books aint no good, and that A guy needs somebody to be near him. A guy goes nuts when if he aint got nobody (Steinbeck 72). In the Great Depression, bare people faced racial discrimination and segregation from the dominant, white culture (Pinckney, 2002). However, this was greatly exaggerated in the story as Crooks was the only black man on the ranch. Unlike Curleys wife and Candy, Crooks accepted his role in society because he knew that he was powerless against the oppressive forces of racism. He was aware that he was treated as if he was less important than the other men and did not have a voice in society. This is just a coon talkin, an a busted-back nigger. So it dont mean nothing, see? (Steinbeck 71). The sad reality of the Great Depression deprived Crooks from his right to be treated like an equal human being with self-worth and connection with others. His acceptance of the situation became the strongest antidote to his experience however, it intensified his loneliness.The Great Depression was a time of prejudice present in Steinbecks Of Mice and Men. Curleys Wife, Candy, and Crooks were some of the characters who represented the loneliness and isolation brought on by their time period. These characters faced social issues like racism, sexism, and ageism, resembling the oppression of minority groups by the discriminatory nature of their society. separately character recognized their loneliness, and depending on what their current situation and role in society was, they took specific actions to fight against, or cope with it. Steinbeck has made it clear that the loneliness brought on by discrimination does significantly impact ones b ehavior, actions and mindsets. Todays generation better understands the societal implications of loneliness and discrimination. It should be societys goal to diminish all forms of discrimination and be supportive of what others go through in their lifetimes in order to lead a better, healthier, and more connected life for all.Works CitedSteinbeck, John. Of Mice and Men. New York, Penguin, 1993.Pinckney, Shelley. Chapter 6 flight and Civil Rights The 30s and 40s. Communism in Washington State, depts.washington.edu/labhist/cpproject/pinckney.shtml.

Attaining The Good Life Philosophy Essay

Attaining The Good Life Philosophy EssayEvery single should want to live the unspoiled disembodied spirit. on with attaining the severe purport there ar many definitions and interpretations of how to get there. People only(a) around the world strive to live the good life apiece day. What whitethorn seem ordinary and boring to some single could be a dream or fantasy for someone who is less fortunate. There argon deuce great days in a persons life- the day he is born and the day he discovers why he was born. In opposite words, when he discovers what he was meant to do with his life. There are plenty of people who concord a desire to live the good life and really make the most of the playfulness available to them. People who cast off lived the good life by my definition which is one that has a balance lifestyle, thoroughgoing(a) goals and dreams which are beneficial to a person and their loved ones, an education, and last but not least having stability through relations hips, work, health, and money include Aristotle and Plato. Plato and Aristotle each had ideas on how to proceed with improving the society in which they were part of during their lifetime. It is necessary therefore to analyze their different theoretical approaches regarding their philosophical perspectives.A child in the less-developed parts Africa could only dream of living the life we live. They would see the good life as having an education, a safe place to live, clean food and water, and a more promising future. These things are given to us and should be implemented into our lives. Instead, we often settle ourselves complaining almost not having brand name clothes, or not going out to eat, or having to do homework.Many undertakes have been made throughout history to better define the word happiness, and the two best-known philosophers in history, Plato and Aristotle, spent much of their studies on the subject. A good and happy life is one in which pleasures outweigh the pain s overall. Many questions have been asked about the good life and happiness. People perpetually cause those questions with their lives, and we see many different ideas of the good life and happiness playing out in the strivings of humanity to live well and be happy. Both Plato and Aristotle felt that happiness was an important f impressor of life. Platos notion of happiness was signifi piece of asstly different from those with normal views. He spent as much time undermining the traditional mind of the good life as to describing his own conception. Plato considered happiness as a state of flawlessness that is hard to appreh finis because it is based on metaphysical presuppositions that have the appearance _or_ semblance unclear for ordinary understanding. Aristotle speaks of the good life as the happy life he does not mean that the good life is merely one of musical note happy or am utilise. Rather, as the good life for a person is the active life of functioning well in those w ays that are crucial and unique to humans. Aristotles idea of the good life is very similar to mine because my definition the good life is merely one with a balanced lifestyle, accomplished goals and dreams, receiving an education, and stability in all aspects of life. These similarities and differences can be observed by exploring what Aristotle and Plato taught.Both Aristotle and Plato see the good life as the state in which a person exhibits total virtue. A virtue is total moral excellence. However, these philosophers differ on the definition of virtue, and its relevance to happiness. Virtue is an essential component of the good life according to Aristotle.The good life cannot be identified with virtue because creation virtuous is consistent with leading an inactive domicile or with suffering greatly. As Plato reasoned, total virtue shows only when his desires have been extinguished. Aristotle argues that the good life is different for each individual because each person go ou t have different virtues. Plato sees the good life as being achieved through the perfect love and lack of desire, while Aristotle deliberates that the good life is achieved through a perfect state that causes its citizens to act upon their virtues Aristotles ideas seem more practical and easier to follow whereas Platos works seem more complicated.Many people are unhappy because they fail to set or attempt to achieve goals. One must(prenominal) set new goals for themselves and do something each day towards its accomplishment. Being true to oneself is a must when setting goals. One must besides cover in mind in order to live the good life the goals made should be positive so once they are achieved, only good things will come out of it. The worst thing in life is to live by what others say. Plato said, Apply yourself both now and in the near life. Without effort, you cannot be prosperous. Though the land be good, You cannot have an abundant crop without cultivation. One should liv e life on ones own terms and should always keep in mind that it is possible to live ones dreams. Aristotle said, Everyone who can live according to his own choice should adopt some goal for the good life be it honor or reputation or wealth or culture-a goal that he will keep in view in all his actions (Mintoff 159). Ultimate happiness occurs when a persons actions and goals which are virtuous.The effects of lack of motivation have a negative impact on people. One will overtop the sense of accomplishment and the satisfaction that comes with succeeding on a big scale. He will also lose the respect of his peers and will be excluded from the winners circle. He will no longer feel in control of his own destiny and in fact be a victim of circumstance. He will tend to earn far less than people of lesser intelligence and ability. One will also worry about the future because they fear they may not be able to deal with things.In 2006, the movie, The Pursuit of Happiness, was released. This m ovie was based on the true story of Christopher Gardners life. Gardner was a bright and talented employ salesman. He continued to struggle making ends meet, Gardner found himself and his five-year-old son evicted from their San Francisco isolatedment with nowhere to go. He and his son endured many hardships, including living in shelters and in overt restrooms. In pursuit of his dream of a better life for the two of them, Gardner landed an internship at a prestigious stock brokerage firm. Although there was no salary, he accepted with the hope that he will end the program with a job and a promising future. He continued to honor his committal as a loving and caring father, using the affection and trust his son has placed in him as an impetus to overcome the obstacles he faced. On the last day of the internship, he was called into an office. Chris was told him that he has been an excellent trainee.Aristotle took on a task similar in some respects to the one Plato conveyed out in th e Republic. One of Platos main points is that it is a great advantage to set up a hierarchical ordering of the elements in ones soul, Un bid Aristotle, who would bring philosophy bottom to earth, Plato held that the unseen, heavenly, eternal things are more real that the things of our world, (Boyleston) and he shows how the traditional virtues can be interpreted to nurture or show the proper relation amidst reason and less rational elements of the psyche. Aristotles function aim shows in a general way that our good lies in the authority of reason, and the detailed studies of the particular virtues queer how each of them reckons the proper kind of ordering of the soul.Aristotles goal was to come to conclusions like Platos, but without relying upon the Platonic metaphysics that takes on a fundamental role in the argument of the Republic. The word metaphysics is defined as the study or theory of humankind sometimes used more narrowly to refer to transcendent reality, that is, rea lity which lies beyond the physical world and cannot therefore be grasped by means of the senses. Plato believed in an inside out view of metaphysics which shows two realms to our reality the realm of changing, becoming things and a realm of fixed, and being forms, which are unchanging and that all things owe their reality. Aristotle saw in his outside in view, that there was only one level to our reality and that in it forms are found only within particular things, which have both form and content. If there were not individual round things, there would be no such thing as the Form roundness. Forms do not exist separately or apart from particulars. Roundness, for example, has no independent existence apart from particular round things. One cannot regain the Form roundness without thinking of a particular round thing.The importance of education cannot be measured because it determines ones future. Its assess is unmatchable. Without it, there will be ignorance, frustration, anger, and demise. With it, solutions, alternatives, and new ideas can be brought forth to further improve life itself. John Milton said, Nevertheless to write now the reforming of Education, though it be one of the greatest and noblest designs that can be thought on, and for the want whereof this Nation perishes . . .the knowledge and the use of which, cannot but be a great forward motion both to the enlargement of truth, and honest living, with much more peace. (Milton 96). We would not let uneducated officials run our country. As we learn from our mistakes, we are able to improve the next time around. Without education, improvement and progress would never be achieved. There is no greater purpose than using the mind to everyones best advantage because it is a invest given by God. Plato stated in the Republic, When the minds eye rests on objects illuminated by truth and reality, it understands and comprehends them, and functions intelligently but when it turns to the twilight world of change and decay, it can only form opinions, its vision is confused and its beliefs shifting, and it seems to lack intelligence (Plato).Both Plato and Aristotle concur that a good education is the way to attain virtue, but they disagree on how a person should be educated because of his differing views on the cause of virtue. By the means of education only ones potential can be used to maximum extent. Education teaches how to think, how to work properly, and how to make decisions. Through receiving an education, one can make a separate identity. Aristotle rejects the existence of Platos forms in general and the form of the good in particular and he rejects the idea that in order to become fully virtuous one must study mathematics and the sciences, and see all branches of knowledge as a unified whole. Aristotle said, Education is an ornament in prosperity and a refuge in adversity. Aristotle believed that education should stupefy from birth and should involve changing the childs habi ts and forming his reason so that his nature, habits, and reason will align. Plato believed that virtue comes from an understanding of true beauty, which exists only in the higher plane of the world. Plato also believes that education should begin when the child is ready to love another. A valuable effect of education is creativity. Creativity can build a bridge in between plainly different concepts of information or knowledge.People without ethical motive will never do beneficial deeds in their life. A lack of morals in life is a huge problem. A person without morals is one who does not care to help others, who does not care to put themselves in others shoes, and who thinks he is better than everyone else. This is a common trait in wealthy people as well. However, not all wealthy people are like this. Those who are will never know what it is like to live a life a poor person lives, nor will they be concerned. They do not think it is necessary to give to the poor because they feel it is their own money. A person with a lack of morals cannot tell the difference between right and wrong. They have never been taught or never acknowledged true morals. He that has improved the virtue or advanced the happiness of one fellow-creature, he that has ascertained a single moral proposition, or added one useful experiment to natural knowledge, may be contented with his own performance, and, with respect to mortals like himself, may demand, like Augustus, to be dismissed at his departure with applause (Johnson 122). deficiency of morals connects to the reasons why people make bad decisions in life. When people do drugs and salute uncontrollably, they see nothing wrong with it because no one told them it was wrong. If they were told, they ignored those who tried to save them from a life of failure. It is sad to see the amount of people who have addictions to certain things and rely on those things for survival. However, these addictions will never help, rather it will hurt them and effect he people around them as well. Lack of morals also leads to violence. Without evident morals people would just turn to violence in stressful pips. It is a proven fact that lack of morals leads to crime. bloody shame Wollstonecraft said, And, when you are examining your heart, if it would not be too much like mathematical drudgery, to which a fine imagination very reluctantly stoops, enquire further, how it is consistent with the unprocessed notions of honesty, and the foundation of moralitytruth for a man to boast of his virtue and independence, when he cannot forget that he is at the moment enjoying the wages of falsehood and that, in a skulking, unmanful way, he has secured himself a pension of fifteen hundred pounds per annum on the Irish establishment? (Wollstonecraft 129). It is morals that will make a person who they are.A balanced lifestyle is vital in living the good life. Ones lifestyle is made up of everything he does for example, work, school, social lif e, and of course personal time. A balanced lifestyle is a collection of all the activities and places that characterize who one is as a person. Ones lifestyle has an emotional impact on. If ones lifestyles net effect leaves him feeling bad about himself then changes in it are needed. Otherwise, it can lead to stress and depression. If one can accommodate all his activities and fit them in his schedule allowing time to let loose and do things for himself, not only will he be happy but everyone around him will be as well. If ones lifestyle isnt balanced, he could find great stress-reduction benefits in taking a thorough inventory of his life and how he spends his time, and making changes. First, one must determine which areas were lacking, and then work on building up those areas. Stress is a normal physical response to events that make one feel threatened or upset ones balance in some way. If one dwells over a stressful situation not only will they be able to see the good out of the situation but it could also lead to pain of any kind, heart disease, sleep problems, and depression. Keep in mind that there is always some good in every bad situation. In order to live the good life one must be able to handle stressful situations.Socializing with friends and family is also an important part of healthy living. Having a healthy social life means having a few close friends and confidants that one enjoys being with to share ideas, plow important personal issues, and have a few good laughs. Being able to express oneself and sharing feelings will help one as he is going on with life because he will know that he has friends to talk to when times go bad. Bottling feelings inside will just hurt oneself more and will not be able to enjoy things he used to because of whatever burden he is going through. He will also bed themselves from all social happenings, which may give his friends the impression that something is being hidden. Keep in mind, not every detail has to be s hared but being able to share thoughts and feelings help one feel more relieved and often helps with taking that extra load off ones back. For the purpose of living one has to assume that the personality is solid, and the self is an entity, and to ignore all contrary evidence. And since to ignore evidence is one of the characteristics of faith, I certainly can proclaim that I believe in personal relationships (Foster 182). Plato and Aristotle agree on the importance of interpersonal relationships in the quest for the good life. Both agree that interpersonal relationships account for the education of individuals, but Aristotle goes further because he sees attaining the good life as societal.By my definition of the good life, one must be positively steadfast in every aspect of his life. Being financially stable provides a healthy and safe way of living. Nevertheless, he will be able to support themselves and his family in the matter of food, water, and shelter. Money will always be a worry factor but if money is handled the right way then it is easy to await stable. Good, stable health keeps ones mind sharp, doctor bills low, a longer lifespan in some cases, and lets one work more to make more money. Plato agreed with this and said, Lack of activity destroys the good condition of every human being, while movement and methodical physical exercise save it and preserve it. One must remain active because a sedentary lifestyle is not beneficial to ones health.The good life is simply success though stability, accomplished goals and dreams, and a balanced lifestyle. pause comes with contentment. Harmony is achieved through balance. Stability revolves around rationalization. The good life with out either element contentment, balanced rationalization cannot be achieved in its true essence. If we started to evaluate what is given to us we would truly see how easy it is to fully understand and live the good life. Lets make the best out of our life for those kids in Afr ica and other third world countries. Lets better ourselves so we can make a difference so those unprivileged people can live the good life as well.It is obvious that both Plato and Aristotle had a different concept of the good life, but their ideas behind living the good life support my opinion. Human happiness is the simple concern for both Plato and Aristotle in their works of literature. Since happiness is almost a universal emotion their conclusions on the cause of happiness are similar. However, Plato and Aristotle are alone different individuals, so the causes of their happiness are completely different. Achieving the good life was viewed by both philosophers as being a life-long task with several aspects to keep in mind. Their basic conceptions and appreciation of life were prominent throughout their studies of how to achieve the good life.Sometimes, big effects come from little causes. For example, when making bread one has to use flour and water and then he knead the doug h. If he forgets to add just a little bit of yeast, he will end up with an unappetizing hockey puck. A big effect, like a healthier person, calls for a lot of big causes, like eating better and exercise more. Sometimes just a little change can make a big difference. To live the good life one must go through the whole process of trial and error.

Severe Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia in Pregnancy

intense Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia in PregnancySevere preeclampsia and eclampsia in maternal quality Disparities in healthcare system between low and high income countriesIntroductionTo create achievement in this modern era of society,reproductive health of women has an unlimited impacttowards national, global and global health concerns. Among them, severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia areglobal health problems which contribute towards increased postpartum psychosis,increasedlifelong hypertension and otherwise health related issues which inflatesthe percentageage towards 2-8% of all pregnancies and related with 9-26% of maternal deaths internationally and 15% of preterm births ( existence Health Organization, 2005). Severe pre- eclampsia, eclampsia, sepsis, unsafe abortion, post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) and prolonged labour are the major derivativesof maternal death worldwide (Duley, 2009 Steegers et al, 2010).As stated by Millennium Development Goals report 2015, later 1990, the maternal death proportionality has declined by 45 percent worldwide, and most of the reduction has occurred after 2000. Most of the reduction has occurred after 2000. The percentage of maternal mortality rate had diminished by 64 percent from 1990 to 2013 globally. Whereas, in Sub-Saharan Africa it dropped by 49 percent (United Nation MDG Report, 2015).Getting all antenatal visits, using contraceptive methods prior and after pregnancy period, willing to allow skilled birth attendant to support in the process of childbirth, media advertisement of the adverse effects of home de outlivery etc. have supported towards maintaining the decrease drift of the maternal mortality ratio after 2000. Within Northern Africa, an improved ratio of 59 percentages in mortality rate has shown in 1990 in the MDG report, 2015. The quantity of expectant women who obtained four or more than than four antenatal visits raised from 50 percent to 89 percent since 1990 to 2015. Contraceptive manifestation among women aged 15 to 49, married or in a harmony, increased from 55 percent to 64 per cent in the year between1990 to 2015 globally. Skill health personnel globally assisted over and above, 71 percent of births in 2014 which helps to fall the death rate during delivery (United Nation MDG Report, 2015).Justification/ RationaleThe predicted trend of maternal death was 183 in 2005 (World Health Organization, 2005). The 5th attention of Millennium Development Goal was 75% diminution of the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) from 1990 to 2015. From 1990 to 2015, maternal mortality worldwide dropped by 44% (WHO, UNICEF, World Bank, 2016). Roughly, 830 women die from pregnancy and childbirth related medical issues globally per day according to the (WHO fact sheet, November 2016). Between 2016 and 2030, according to the Sustainable Development Goals target, we aim at dropping the maternal mortality ratio which is fewer than 70 maternal deaths per 1 million live child birth worldwide by 2030 (Alkema et al., 2016).Severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia are the main causes of death of childbearing vex. These diseases help to develop postpartum psychosis and lifelong hypertension after giving childbirth so that if the mother stays alive she gets these groups of diseases afterwards which leads towards decrease in QALY (Quality adjusted life Index) by adding an amount of maternal unwholesomeness ratio which is a threat to take further. In these regards, I am concentrating on the topics of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia now, which can be prevented by prudent and proactive management of respective health care system. healthcare system varies in different socio-economic condition of the country e.g. the United Kingdom abide by the rules of Beveridge Model whereas low income countries e.g. south Asia, South Africa stands by due Model. Among the four introductory models (Beveridge model, Bismark model, national health insurance model, out of pocket model), the Beveridge model is ar ranged and funded by the government through income tax payment or National Insurance. It is perhaps the worlds purest model of Health care system. United Kingdom is following this model where we do not need to pay every doctors bill, which is a progressive facilitator towards reducing maternal mortality on the way to attaining goals and encouraging people towards getting more and more touch with the physicians.On the other hand, poor nations e.g. South Africa, Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Bhutan, etc. counties are following the out of pocket model whereas they do not have any organized healthcare system. The basic rule in much model is the rich gets the medical care because they could provide healthcare professionals with monetary amounts and the poor lag behind and die. Besides, at that place is scarceness of knowledge, education, and vehicle to go to a doctor even in case of life threatening condition of those people. Moreover, women are portrayed as a imprimatur gender in tho se deprived countries so there are also inequities in social position, which leads them towards lack of access to the health care system. Sometimes there are other issue which lead pregnant women to stay at home and deliver babies such as environmental hazards e.g. flood, drought, heavy rain, tornado, etc. backing in geographically hard to reach areas, cultural trends, natural disasters make them to do so.This health care system of Beveridge model achieves 0% maternal mortality ratio in 2015 in case of eclampsia and pre-eclampsia related maternal mortality ratio (REF). So to reduce maternal death related to eclampsia and pre-eclampsia in low income countries, we can follow this best models management system. In most the articles, literatures, journals had taken the data of eclampsia and pre-eclampsia together because eclampsia is the end stage of pre-eclampsia condition including convulsion, so it is nearly impossible to discuss them separately. For this above reason, I am discussi ng both of the issues altogether as an overall view.A significant come in of perinatal deaths of mother in some areas of the world reflects discrimination in access to health facilities and highlights the gap between rich and poor. Maternal mortality and morbidity are higher among the poor rural populations in developing nations. Practically all maternal demises (99%) occur in developing countries. For an example in sub-Saharan Africa, more than half of these maternal deaths occur as well as in South Asia, nearly one-third of these unpredictable deaths occur due to the handsome and humanitarian settings. According to the recent data of World health organization, the maternal mortality ratio in developing countries in 2015 was 239 per 1 million live births opposed to 12 per 1 million live births in developed countries (WHO Factsheet, 2016).In rural Bangladesh, more than 75% of neonatal births as well as delivery occur at home in the absence of skilled birth attendant (Sikder et al. , 2014). As a consequence, the majority of obstetric complications defined as acute conditions such as sepsis, eclampsia, haemorrhage, and obstructed labour that can cause maternal deaths arise in the home (Belizn, Buekens, Althabe, Bergel, 2006)Healthcare system professionals are more in quantities in the urban setting than in the rural healthcare system in the out-of-pocket model, whereas we can see the equal distribution of caregivers and physicians in Beveridge Model.

My Physical Education Philosophy :: Teaching Teachers P.E. Essays

My Physical Education Philosophy The goal of this paper is to inform others of my reasoning why physical educators are strategic and why it is my dream to become one. There are three main points I would like to discuss the value of physical education ,being a power imitate ,and why it is my dream to become one. The value of physical education P.E. teachers bring to schools and their students. P.E. has an effect on everyday life. With this in mind I olfactory property P.E. is highly valuable. Physical education activities have development in mind. Children can participate in a variety of activities and are encouraged to achieve boilers suit wellness by continuously staying active. In physical education, children are not evaluated on how well they can play a specific game. This in incline helps children achieve overall self esteem. To acquire good self esteem, one must have a good model. Role models can make a huge difference in a childs life. My Physical Education teacher had a major impact of effecting of what I want to be now. Aleta Jo Crotty helped me to learn to fix responsibility for my actions, and in my choices I am in control. By using guidelines that was set by her for my life, I hope to reach just one child. P.E. teachers must also encourage creative ability and the importance of overall health, socially, physically and emotionally. I feel that if a student has a good role model than they can achieve success in all of the areas mentioned. P. E. teachers teach skills that I know are necessary to mold healthy children for a healthy future. In order to achieve such skills it is also important that children have a safe environment in which to exercise motor skills. As children grow, they become more(prenominal) interested in the world around them through the use of motor skills . P.E. can help each child with development of these skills. P.E. teachers can take the judgment of conviction to lo ok at children as a whole rather than in separate parts.

Why did the Weimar Republic fail? :: World War II History

Why did the Weimar republic fail?After World War One ended and Germany was defeated, they returned to their uncouth with heavy losses, a 6.6 trillion pound reparation cost and a feeling of being let down. The country suffered huge economical losses and the country fell into poverty and starvation. whatever government ruling a country like this already would have a very hard time keeping alive. At this point the urgency Weimar Republic constitution was adopted by three parties, the Social Democratic Party, the Catholic Center and the German Democratic Party, in early 1919 they won 76 percent of the vote and began to govern Germany. The Weimar Republic was modelled around the imperial constitution and was written in Weimar. People had to blame someone and they blamed the republic for everything, for loosing the war, to the smear they were in now. One of the main reasons the Weimar republic fell from power was the treaty of Versailles, the German people thought all the bad things th at had happened to them and their country were a resultant role of it. In addition to this there were parties from the left and right challenging them. A bi product of the treaty of Versailles was the huge economic lose in their country this gave the German people more reason to blame and loathe the Weimar republic. The third and final main reason was Hitlers raise to power, he offered the countries people freedom from the Weimar draw rein and they gradually accepted it. After world war one ended and the treaty of Versailles was signed, German troops returned home feeling angry. They felt that there was no need to call an end to the war, as it didnt seem as though they had the lower hand and Germany had not been invaded. They were bitter because they couldnt fight on and knew it had all been for zilch and they hadnt gained anything. In fact they lost a lot during the peace conference they were forced to, most importantly redefine their Western borders and give over a lot of land (13%), pay for damages amounting to $33 billion us dollars, hugely diminish their army and navy and destroy their air-force, donate some of their coal mines (26%) to France as compensation for destroying theirs and accept full responsibility for the war. The German people found the treaty hugely unfair and unjust.

Impact of Tone in Charlotte Brontes Jane Eyre :: Jane Eyre Essays

Jane Eyre  The Impact of the modulate  The tone of Jane Eyre is direct, perhaps even blunt. There is no prissy little-girl sensibility, but a startlingly independent, even skeptical perspective. At the age of 10, the orphan Jane already sees through the hypocrisy of her self-righteous Christian elders. She tells her bullying Aunt Reed, People think you a good woman, but you be bad hard-hearted. You are deceitful and I am glad you are no relative of mine I lead never call you aunt again so presbyopic as I live. I will never come to see you when I am grown up and if every one asks me how I liked you, and how you treated me, I will say that the very thought of you makes me sick. (In fact, when her aunt is elderly and dying, Jane does issue to visit her, and forgives her. But thats remote in the future.) With the logic of a mature philosopher, in fact rather like Friedrich Nietzsche to come, Jane protests the basic admonitions of Christianity as a schoolgirl I must resist those who ... continue in disliking me I must resist those who punish me unjustly. It is as natural as that I should love those who show me affection, or submit to punish ment when I feel that it is deserved. And this bold declaration, which would have struck readers of 1847 (in fact, of 1947) as radical and infeminine Restlessness was in my nature it agitated me to pain sometimes ... Women are supposed to be very calm generally but women feel just as men feel they need exercise for their faculties, and a field for their efforts as a lot as their brothers do they suffer from too rigid a constraint, too absolute a stagnation, precisely as men would suffer. Instead, the novel begins with the seemingly discomfited statement There was no possibility of taking a walk that rainy day, and counters almost immediately with, I was glad of it I never liked long walks. When excluded from Christmas revelries in the Reed household, the child Jane says, To speak the truth, I had not the least wish to go into company. Janes defiance, which doesnt exclude childlike fears, strikes us as forthright in the way of the adolescent temperaments of other famous literary voices -- Jo March of Louisa May Alcotts Little Women, Huck Finn, Holden Caulfield and their now-countless younger siblings.Impact of Tone in Charlotte Brontes Jane Eyre Jane Eyre Essays Jane Eyre  The Impact of the Tone  The tone of Jane Eyre is direct, perhaps even blunt. There is no prissy little-girl sensibility, but a startlingly independent, even skeptical perspective. At the age of 10, the orphan Jane already sees through the hypocrisy of her self-righteous Christian elders. She tells her bullying Aunt Reed, People think you a good woman, but you are bad hard-hearted. You are deceitful and I am glad you are no relative of mine I will never call you aunt again so long as I live. I will never come to see you when I am grown up and if any one asks me how I liked you, and how you treated me, I will sa y that the very thought of you makes me sick. (In fact, when her aunt is elderly and dying, Jane does return to visit her, and forgives her. But thats far in the future.) With the logic of a mature philosopher, in fact rather like Friedrich Nietzsche to come, Jane protests the basic admonitions of Christianity as a schoolgirl I must resist those who ... persist in disliking me I must resist those who punish me unjustly. It is as natural as that I should love those who show me affection, or submit to punishment when I feel that it is deserved. And this bold declaration, which would have struck readers of 1847 (in fact, of 1947) as radical and infeminine Restlessness was in my nature it agitated me to pain sometimes ... Women are supposed to be very calm generally but women feel just as men feel they need exercise for their faculties, and a field for their efforts as much as their brothers do they suffer from too rigid a constraint, too absolute a stagnation, precisely as men would s uffer. Instead, the novel begins with the seemingly disappointed statement There was no possibility of taking a walk that rainy day, and counters almost immediately with, I was glad of it I never liked long walks. When excluded from Christmas revelries in the Reed household, the child Jane says, To speak the truth, I had not the least wish to go into company. Janes defiance, which doesnt exclude childlike fears, strikes us as forthright in the way of the adolescent temperaments of other famous literary voices -- Jo March of Louisa May Alcotts Little Women, Huck Finn, Holden Caulfield and their now-countless younger siblings.

Can Computers Understand? :: essays research papers

Can Computers understand?1) Thinking is the hallmark of understanding.2) Only special machines peck think.3) If something brush aside think it can understand.4) Only special machines that can think can understand.5) "Mental" states and their resulting actions are products of thecenter of activity (brain).6) To understand, thoughts must be produced by the brain.7) A electronic computers mental states and events are controlled by a program.8) The program is not a product of the computer.9) A computer does not produce "thoughts" in its brain.10) A computer cannot understand.John Searle addresses the point of the ability of ArtificialIntelligence (AI) to understand, in header Brains, and Programs. His mainargument is that because AIs are computers and computers defend no thoughts oftheir own, they cannot understand. Any actions being performed to seizebehavior are confined by the programs available to the computer. He presentsthe example of a man linking Chinese ch aracters and appearing to know thelanguage, but in mankind the man is just following the instructions given to him( the program). This example serves well to explain how although a computer canlook like it understands a story, it can do no more than "go through themotions."Of course such a definitive standpoint on an issue as controversial asthe capacity of an AI to understand will draw many critics. The criticism ofhis theory that I find to be the most credible is The Other Mind Reply offeredby Yale University. This line of thinking asks if behavior is what we candetermine the presence of experience through, and an AI passes a behavioral test,why dont we attribute cognition to it?     I myself do not believe in the philosophy of AI understanding, becauseto support either side on this issue one must have a belief for or against the